Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill proposes changes to how the Federal Trade Commission is governed and structured.
The problem
Concerns exist about Federal Trade Commission leadership structure, decision-making processes, or accountability. Reforming governance could improve agency operations.
The proposal
Bill would modify Federal Trade Commission governance, likely affecting leadership roles, voting procedures, or organizational structure. Specific changes require bill text review.
The impact
Affects FTC operations, consumer protection enforcement, and businesses regulated by the agency. Changes may influence how competition and consumer protection rules are made.
Reform could make the FTC more transparent and accountable to Congress and the public. Better governance structures might improve oversight of agency decisions and spending.
Changes to governance could speed up how the FTC approves rules and enforcement actions. Faster decisions might help businesses understand regulations sooner.
Reformed governance could establish clearer roles and responsibilities for FTC leadership. This might reduce internal conflicts and improve organizational efficiency.
Changes to FTC governance could create confusion about how rules will be enforced. Companies may struggle to understand new regulatory requirements during transition.
Some governance changes could slow down consumer protection enforcement or weaken complaint investigations. Vulnerable consumers might face greater harm from unfair business practices.
Governance reforms might increase partisan divisions over FTC leadership appointments and decisions. Disagreements could paralyze the agency's ability to act on important issues.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.