Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Enhances benefits and support programs for public safety officers and their families.
The problem
Public safety officers face job-related risks and hardships. Their families need better support when officers are injured or killed in the line of duty.
The proposal
The bill improves benefits for police, firefighters, and other public safety workers. It likely expands death benefits, disability pay, mental health support, and survivor assistance programs.
The impact
Police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and their families receive enhanced financial protection. Taxpayers fund increased government spending on these benefit programs.
Officers who get hurt or become disabled on the job receive improved financial assistance. This helps them and their families stay stable during difficult times.
Families of officers killed in the line of duty get better death benefits and ongoing support. This recognizes the sacrifice these families make.
Enhanced benefits likely include better mental health counseling and support services. This addresses the trauma and stress public safety workers face daily.
Better benefits make public safety jobs more attractive and help keep experienced officers working. Communities benefit from a more stable police and fire force.
Enhanced benefits cost more taxpayer money. Federal or state budgets must find funding elsewhere or increase overall spending.
Other dangerous jobs like construction or mining workers may not receive similar benefits. This could seem unfair to workers with comparable risks.
Creating and managing expanded benefit programs requires additional government staff and resources. Some money goes to administration rather than direct benefits.
Expanded benefit programs could be difficult to monitor, potentially leading to fraud or misuse of funds. Oversight would be necessary and costly.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.