Latest action: Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Senate Majority Leader schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Bill to transfer Geese House Site land to Native American ownership or control.
The problem
A specific land parcel called Geese House Site may need to be transferred from federal ownership to Native American tribes or organizations for cultural, historical, or community purposes.
The proposal
The bill conveys the Geese House Site property to Native American beneficiaries, likely a tribe or tribal organization, transferring federal land management to Native American control.
The impact
Native American tribes gain ownership or management control of the Geese House Site. Federal government transfers property. Local communities near the site may experience changes in land use.
Transferring land to Native American control supports tribal self-determination and allows tribes to manage ancestral or culturally significant lands according to their values and needs.
Land conveyances can address past federal takeovers of Native American lands, returning property as part of reconciliation efforts and respecting tribal heritage.
Native American ownership allows tribes to protect cultural sites, traditional practices, and historical landmarks important to their communities.
Reduces federal administrative burden by transferring management responsibilities to local tribal authorities better positioned to oversee the property.
The federal government relinquishes management authority over the property. This may reduce federal oversight and create questions about long-term land stewardship standards.
Future tribal use of the land might differ from current or historical uses, potentially affecting nearby communities, conservation efforts, or public access.
Without an official summary, the specific location, size, current use, and full implications of the transfer are unclear to the public and policymakers.
Nearby communities or stakeholders may object to losing federal management of the site or worry about changes to local land use patterns.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.