Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates a rapid response system for foodborne illness outbreaks to protect public health.
The problem
Foodborne illness outbreaks can spread quickly and cause serious harm. Current response systems may be too slow to stop illnesses from spreading to many people.
The proposal
Establishes a rapid response program to quickly identify, track, and respond to foodborne illness outbreaks. Improves coordination between health agencies.
The impact
Food companies, health agencies, and consumers benefit from faster outbreak detection and response. Reduces illness and deaths from contaminated food.
Quick identification of outbreaks means fewer people get sick. Rapid response can prevent illnesses from spreading to multiple states.
Coordinated response between agencies improves disease tracking. People are safer when authorities respond quickly to food contamination.
Quick action limits damage to food businesses and supply chains. Prevents widespread product recalls that harm companies and consumers.
Rapid response systems encourage better safety practices in food production. Creates accountability for companies handling food.
Building and running a rapid response system costs taxpayer money. May require hiring new staff and technology infrastructure.
Food companies may face new reporting requirements and regulations. Small businesses might struggle with compliance costs.
Rapid data sharing between agencies could raise privacy issues. Personal health information might be collected and shared widely.
Different states and agencies may not coordinate smoothly at first. Technical systems need to work together reliably.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.