Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to reduce broadband costs for American consumers through regulatory and market changes.
The problem
Many Americans pay high broadband prices and lack access to affordable internet service. Rural and low-income communities face particularly limited options and expensive rates.
The proposal
The bill likely addresses broadband affordability through regulatory measures, competition promotion, or subsidy programs, though specific provisions are not yet publicly available in detail.
The impact
Consumers, especially low-income and rural households, would potentially see lower internet costs. Broadband providers and telecommunications companies would face new regulations or competitive pressures.
Consumers, particularly low-income families, could pay less for broadband service. This would make internet access more affordable for households struggling with utility expenses.
Rural communities often lack competitive internet options and pay higher prices. Lower costs could help close the digital divide between urban and rural areas.
More competitive broadband markets can drive innovation and service improvements. Providers would have incentives to offer better speeds and customer service.
Cheaper internet access enables students to learn online and workers to find better jobs. Small businesses gain affordable tools for growth and market reach.
Broadband companies may face reduced revenue and profit margins. Smaller internet service providers could struggle to compete or survive under new regulations.
Lower prices might reduce company funding for network upgrades and expansion. This could slow deployment of faster broadband technologies to underserved areas.
Regulating a complex broadband market is difficult and time-consuming. Rules could be poorly designed or create unintended economic consequences.
Companies facing revenue pressure might reduce customer service quality or stop serving unprofitable areas. Service reliability could decline in some regions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.