Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates a federal plan to help communities respond to dangerous heat waves.
The problem
Heat waves kill hundreds of Americans yearly and harm public health. Communities lack coordinated federal support for extreme heat events.
The proposal
Establishes federal coordination and response strategies for extreme heat emergencies across government agencies and departments.
The impact
Public health agencies, communities, and vulnerable populations gain better heat emergency planning and federal resources.
A coordinated federal plan helps communities prepare for and respond to dangerous heat waves more effectively. This could save lives by ensuring resources reach people in need faster.
Elderly people, low-income families, and those without air conditioning are most at risk during heat waves. Federal coordination ensures these groups get priority help during emergencies.
Better heat preparedness prevents heat-related illnesses and deaths, reducing expensive emergency room visits and hospital stays. This saves money for individuals and the healthcare system.
Federal coordination means state and local governments share heat warning information and resources more effectively. Communities get clearer, faster alerts about dangerous heat.
Creating new federal heat response structures adds to government spending and bureaucracy. This increases costs and may duplicate work already done by states and cities.
The bill doesn't specify how much money will be spent or where it comes from. Congress would need to approve separate funding, which may be hard to get.
States and cities may see this as federal overreach into local emergency management. Some prefer handling heat emergencies without federal involvement or rules.
Getting multiple federal agencies to work together effectively is difficult. Poor coordination could waste resources or create confusion during actual heat emergencies.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.