Latest action: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Ashley Hinson (R-IA)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Creates new criminal penalties for international trade violations and intellectual property theft.
The problem
U.S. companies and workers face losses from trade fraud, counterfeiting, and intellectual property theft by foreign actors. Current enforcement mechanisms may be insufficient.
The proposal
Establishes criminal offenses and penalties for international trade crimes including smuggling, counterfeiting, and IP theft. Enhances law enforcement tools and coordination.
The impact
Affects importers, exporters, manufacturers, law enforcement agencies, and workers in industries vulnerable to trade violations and counterfeiting.
Criminal penalties for trade violations can reduce unfair competition from counterfeits and smuggled goods. This may protect jobs in domestic manufacturing and industries harmed by illegal trade practices.
Enhanced enforcement against counterfeiting and intellectual property theft protects American companies' innovation and investments. Companies can better defend patents, trademarks, and designs.
New criminal tools and coordination mechanisms help federal agencies detect and prosecute trade crimes more effectively. Creates clearer legal standards for enforcement agencies.
Criminal penalties deter foreign actors from unfair trade practices, creating more equal competition for American businesses. Protects legitimate importers from unfair competition.
Aggressive enforcement could escalate trade disputes with other countries, risking retaliatory tariffs or restrictions. May complicate diplomatic relationships and trade negotiations.
Importers and businesses may face higher costs to ensure compliance with new trade crime standards. Small businesses with limited compliance resources could be disproportionately affected.
Without detailed legislative language, enforcement standards could be unclear, leading to inconsistent application. Businesses may struggle to understand what constitutes criminal conduct.
Expanding criminal penalties raises due process questions about evidence standards and defendant rights. Criminal penalties are more severe than civil remedies, requiring careful procedural protections.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.