Latest action: Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 42 - 0.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Updates how the federal government buys and uses technology.
The problem
Federal agencies use outdated technology systems that waste money and work poorly. Government needs modern tools to serve citizens better and protect data.
The proposal
Modernizes how government purchases technology, updates old computer systems, and improves digital services for citizens. Creates new rules for tech updates.
The impact
Federal workers get better tools. Citizens may access government services more easily online. Taxpayers may see efficiency gains or costs.
Modern technology helps agencies serve citizens faster. Online services work better. Citizens waste less time on government tasks.
Updated systems work more efficiently. Government wastes less money maintaining broken old technology. Better technology planning reduces costs.
Modern systems have better security. Citizen information stays safer from hackers. Government data is more secure.
Better tools help employees work faster. Workers spend less time fighting with broken systems. Government work gets done more efficiently.
Buying new technology costs a lot of money initially. Upgrading all federal systems is expensive. Taxpayers fund the costs.
Switching to new systems can cause temporary problems. Government services might be slower during updates. Citizens could face delays.
Federal workers must learn new systems. Training takes time and money. Some workers may struggle with new technology.
No official summary limits understanding of specific changes. Implementation challenges may emerge. Success depends on execution details.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.