Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Reauthorizes federal funding for international education programs to boost innovation and student exchanges.
The problem
Title VI of the Higher Education Act needs updating to keep international education competitive and encourage new approaches to global learning opportunities.
The proposal
Renews and updates the Title VI program funding and requirements to support international education initiatives, potentially adding new innovation incentives and program improvements.
The impact
College students, universities, and international education programs receive continued federal support and may access new funding for expanded global learning opportunities.
Reauthorizing international education helps American students develop skills needed in a global economy. It encourages students to study abroad and learn foreign languages, making them more competitive for jobs.
Colleges and universities that run international education programs receive continued federal funding. This helps institutions maintain study abroad options and international student partnerships.
The bill emphasizes innovation in international education, which could lead to new teaching methods, virtual exchange programs, and creative partnerships between American and foreign universities.
Student exchanges and international education programs strengthen relationships between the United States and other countries through cultural understanding and academic connections.
Reauthorizing and expanding international education programs requires federal funding. This adds to government spending that must come from existing budgets or new revenue.
Without an official summary, it's unclear exactly how the bill defines innovation or what new requirements universities must meet. This uncertainty makes it hard to assess full costs and effects.
International education programs primarily benefit students at universities with resources to offer study abroad. Smaller colleges and lower-income students may have limited access to these opportunities.
Federal funding for international programs might be questioned when some argue resources should prioritize domestic education needs and STEM fields within the United States.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.