Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bans using campaign money or legal funds to pay sexual misconduct settlements.
The problem
Public figures may use campaign contributions or legal defense funds to pay settlements for sexual assault, abuse, or harassment claims, raising accountability concerns.
The proposal
The bill prohibits campaign contributions and legal defense funds from being used to pay any settlements, penalties, or related costs for sexual assault, abuse, or harassment claims.
The impact
Political candidates, office holders, and their campaigns would face restrictions on fund usage. Accusers and taxpayers could be affected by enforcement changes.
Prevents public officials from using donor money to hide misconduct. Forces individuals to pay settlements from personal funds, showing personal responsibility for their actions.
Ensures donor money goes to political activities, not personal legal problems. Donors can trust their contributions support campaigns, not settlements.
Victims may see settlements come from personal assets rather than hidden campaign funds. Increases transparency about who is paying for misconduct claims.
Makes it harder to quietly settle sexual misconduct claims without public awareness. Encourages transparency in how powerful people handle such allegations.
Victims might find it harder to get settlements if accused officials lack personal funds. Could reduce compensation available to people harmed by misconduct.
Determining what counts as a sexual misconduct settlement could be complex. Funds might be disguised or reclassified to avoid the ban.
Officials might fight claims harder rather than settle, forcing victims into costly lawsuits. Could delay justice for people coming forward with allegations.
Unclear if the ban covers legal fees, insurance, or indirect payments. Could create loopholes or unintended consequences in how funds are used.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.