Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 525.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Maggie Hassan (D-NH)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Supports obstetric services and readiness in rural areas across the United States.
The problem
Rural areas struggle to maintain childbirth services. Many rural hospitals lack obstetric departments. Women in rural communities face long distances to reach maternity care.
The proposal
The bill likely provides funding, grants, or support programs to help rural hospitals maintain or establish obstetric services and maternal healthcare infrastructure.
The impact
Rural pregnant women and communities gain better access to childbirth services. Rural hospitals receive resources to provide obstetric care locally.
Rural women would have closer access to obstetric services, reducing travel times for pregnancy care and delivery. This improves safety outcomes during emergencies.
Rural hospitals receive resources to maintain or create obstetric departments. This helps keep rural hospitals financially viable and maintains local employment.
Local access to maternal care reduces delays in emergency situations. Pregnant women receive timely prenatal and postnatal services.
Rural communities maintain comprehensive healthcare services. This attracts residents and supports rural population stability.
The bill requires federal funding. Taxpayer money supports rural hospital obstetric programs, which may be costly.
Rural areas struggle to recruit and retain obstetric specialists. Funding alone may not solve workforce shortages in these regions.
Without detailed bill text, it is unclear if the proposed approach actually solves rural obstetric service problems or uses funding efficiently.
Rural hospitals must meet regulatory requirements and program conditions. Administrative costs may burden already-stretched rural healthcare systems.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.