Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to protect people from fake AI-generated sexual images used to harm or exploit them.
The problem
Artificial intelligence can create fake sexual images of real people without consent. These deepfake images are used to harass, blackmail, and harm individuals, especially women and children.
The proposal
The bill would create laws against making and sharing non-consensual fake sexual images made with AI. It establishes penalties and gives victims the right to sue people who create or distribute these images.
The impact
Victims of fake sexual images gain legal protection and ability to seek justice. Technology companies must implement safeguards. People who create or share such images face criminal and civil consequences.
Gives people harmed by fake sexual images legal recourse and the ability to sue. Creates criminal penalties that deter people from making and sharing these harmful images. Provides a clear way for victims to get justice.
Specifically targets AI deepfake technology that existing laws may not cover. Recognizes a modern form of abuse that didn't exist before. Creates legal tools for a new problem.
Provides special protection for minors and other vulnerable people. Helps prevent child exploitation through fake images. Targets a growing threat to children's safety online.
Pushes technology companies to develop tools that stop AI abuse. Creates incentive for platforms to monitor and prevent illegal content. Holds companies responsible for harms on their systems.
Restrictions on image creation and sharing could limit free expression rights. May be hard to draw a clear line between harmful content and protected speech. Could face legal challenges based on First Amendment protections.
Difficult to find and prosecute people making fake images, especially across state and national borders. Requires significant resources from law enforcement agencies. International images may be hard to regulate or punish.
The bill summary doesn't explain exact definitions of what counts as illegal. Vague language could lead to confusion about what's actually banned. May be hard to apply consistently across different cases.
Companies would need expensive new technology to detect and remove fake images. Could cost billions for platforms to comply with the law. May hurt smaller tech companies that can't afford safeguards.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.