Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Establishes emergency shutdown procedures for artificial intelligence systems.
The problem
Rapid AI development raises concerns about potential risks from uncontrolled AI systems. Policymakers seek safeguards to prevent harmful outcomes.
The proposal
Creates a mechanism to shut down AI systems during emergencies. Defines procedures, authority, and conditions for activation.
The impact
Affects AI developers, technology companies, government agencies, and AI users. Establishes new regulatory requirements and emergency protocols.
Provides emergency response capability if AI systems malfunction or behave unexpectedly. Offers protection against unintended harmful outcomes from AI technology.
Addresses concerns about advanced AI systems operating without adequate controls. Gives authorities tools to prevent worst-case scenarios.
Establishes clear legal procedures and decision-making processes for AI emergencies. Prevents confusion during crisis situations.
Provides AI companies with explicit regulatory expectations. Allows developers to design systems compatible with safety requirements.
Emergency shutdowns could interrupt critical services using AI technology. Hospitals, infrastructure, and other systems might be affected negatively.
Companies must design expensive safety systems and procedures. Compliance costs could increase AI development expenses significantly.
Bill provides minimal details about how shutdown procedures actually work. Lack of specifics makes practical implementation unclear.
Broad emergency powers could be misused for political purposes. Insufficient safeguards against abuse of shutdown authority.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.