Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill strengthens cybersecurity protections for schools and K-12 educational institutions.
The problem
Schools face increasing cyber threats and attacks on student data, learning systems, and networks. Many lack resources for adequate cybersecurity defenses and expertise.
The proposal
Establishes cybersecurity requirements, standards, and support programs for K-12 schools. Likely includes funding, training, and coordination with federal cybersecurity agencies.
The impact
Schools, students, parents, and educators gain stronger protections. Students' personal and educational data receives better security. Schools face new compliance requirements and costs.
Stronger cybersecurity helps prevent theft of student personal information, grades, and educational records. This reduces identity theft risks and privacy violations affecting children.
Reduces risks of cyberattacks that disrupt school operations, online learning, and testing systems. Schools can maintain reliable access to educational technology.
Federal funding and training help schools develop cybersecurity expertise without overwhelming limited budgets. Smaller and rural districts gain resources typically unavailable to them.
Prevention reduces expensive incident response, legal fees, and notification costs schools face after successful attacks. Protects limited education budgets.
Schools must meet new federal standards, creating administrative work and complexity. Small districts with limited staff face significant implementation challenges.
Cybersecurity requires continuous investment in tools, training, and staff. Federal funding may not cover all expenses, shifting costs to local budgets.
One-size-fits-all federal standards may not suit diverse school types and community needs. Rural and urban schools have different infrastructure and resources.
New data collection and monitoring for cybersecurity purposes could raise privacy concerns. Balancing protection with student privacy requires careful implementation.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.