Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires the federal government to assess indoor air quality in federal buildings.
The problem
Federal buildings may have poor indoor air quality that affects worker health and safety. Current standards and assessment practices may be inadequate or inconsistent.
The proposal
The bill directs federal agencies to evaluate and report on indoor air quality conditions in federal facilities using consistent assessment methods and standards.
The impact
Federal workers, building occupants, and facility managers will be affected. Results could lead to improved air quality standards, upgrades, and operational changes in federal buildings.
Better air quality reduces respiratory issues, allergies, and sick days among federal employees. Improved indoor environments can boost productivity and reduce healthcare costs.
Establishes uniform assessment standards across all federal facilities. Ensures fair and comparable air quality monitoring nationwide.
Regular assessments catch air quality issues before they become serious health threats. Data-driven approach allows targeted improvements where needed most.
Assessment reports provide public information about federal building conditions. Citizens and workers can understand environmental conditions in government spaces.
Conducting assessments across all federal buildings requires significant federal spending. Ongoing monitoring and reporting will add to agency budgets.
Federal agencies must allocate staff and resources to conduct assessments and produce reports. Smaller facilities may struggle with implementation requirements.
Without defined air quality standards in the bill text, agencies may face confusion about measurement requirements. Vague criteria could lead to inconsistent implementation.
Assessment may reveal widespread air quality problems requiring expensive fixes. Budget impacts for necessary upgrades are unpredictable.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.