Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates state offices dedicated to women's health support and expansion.
The problem
Women may lack coordinated state-level health services and advocacy. Current fragmentation makes it difficult to address women's health needs systematically.
The proposal
Establishes dedicated state offices to coordinate women's health programs, services, and policy development across states.
The impact
Women receive coordinated health services. States gain new health offices. Healthcare providers work with new state agencies. Taxpayers fund new government positions.
Women's health services could be better organized and easier to access. State offices could connect different programs that currently work separately. Patients might receive more consistent care across programs.
Dedicated offices give women's health issues specific attention and resources. State officials would focus directly on women's health needs. This could lead to better policies and programs tailored to women.
State offices could gather better information about women's health problems and needs. Better data helps identify gaps in services. This information guides future policy decisions.
State offices can work directly with local communities and healthcare providers. Direct relationships may improve service delivery and awareness of available programs.
Creating state offices requires funding for staff and operations. States or federal government must pay for new government positions and offices. This increases government spending.
New offices might duplicate work already done by existing health agencies. Multiple agencies handling similar issues could waste resources and create confusion. States may already have health departments covering these areas.
States differ in resources, healthcare systems, and needs. A one-size-fits-all approach may not work well everywhere. States could struggle to implement offices effectively or sustainably.
The bill provides no summary, making it unclear how offices relate to existing state agencies. Overlapping authority between new offices and current health departments could create conflicts.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.