Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill targets organized crime members and prevents them from entering the United States.
The problem
Organized crime groups operate across borders and may attempt entry into the U.S., potentially bringing criminal activities and threatening public safety.
The proposal
Establishes procedures to identify, exclude, and remove individuals affiliated with racketeering organizations from U.S. territory and entry ports.
The impact
Immigration enforcement, law enforcement, criminal organizations, and international travelers are affected through stricter entry screening and deportation processes.
Preventing known racketeers from entering strengthens law enforcement's ability to protect citizens. This reduces potential organized crime activity within U.S. borders and protects communities from criminal networks.
Gives immigration officials clearer tools to screen individuals against organized crime databases. Stronger vetting procedures make entry points more secure and harder for criminals to exploit.
Demonstrates U.S. commitment to combating transnational organized crime. May encourage partner nations to strengthen their own border enforcement and share intelligence about criminal networks.
Exclusion procedures could inadvertently affect innocent people mistaken for criminals or falsely accused. Without clear safeguards, people might face deportation without adequate opportunity to challenge evidence against them.
Requires training immigration officers, updating screening databases, and conducting investigations. Government spending increases for enforcement personnel, technology, and legal proceedings may strain budgets.
Without a bill summary, it's unclear exactly which organizations qualify as racketeering groups. Vague definitions could lead to inconsistent enforcement or unintended consequences for borderline organizations.
Excluding foreign criminals only addresses international threats, not organized crime already operating domestically. Some argue resources would be better spent on prosecuting criminals already in the country.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.