Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 523.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Senate Majority Leader schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Requires clearer labeling on food and health products sold in America.
The problem
Consumers struggle to understand product labels because labels use complicated language, small text, or unclear information about ingredients and health effects.
The proposal
The bill would set new federal rules for how companies must label their products, requiring simpler language, larger text, and clearer ingredient lists.
The impact
Food and health companies must change labels. Shoppers get easier-to-read information. Costs for businesses may increase from redesigning packages.
Clearer labels help people understand what they are buying and make healthier food choices. This could reduce confusion and help people avoid products with ingredients they want to avoid.
Clear labeling standards make it harder for companies to hide misleading information. Consumers are better protected from deceptive marketing practices.
When people understand nutrition information better, they may eat healthier. This could reduce rates of obesity, heart disease, and other diet-related health problems.
Standardized, clear labels benefit people with low literacy, older Americans, and non-English speakers who struggle with current complicated labels.
Companies must redesign packaging, update printing equipment, and retest labels. These costs may be passed on to consumers through higher prices.
Federal rules might not work for all products or all types of consumers. Some industries may face unfair requirements that don't match their products.
Simplifying labels could leave out technical information that some consumers want. Over-simplification might prevent people from getting full details about products.
The government must check many companies to make sure they follow new rules. This requires more resources and inspectors.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.