Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to expand and grow the federal cybersecurity workforce.
The problem
The U.S. federal government faces a shortage of skilled cybersecurity workers to protect critical systems and data from cyber attacks.
The proposal
The bill creates new positions and programs to recruit, train, and hire more cybersecurity professionals for federal agencies.
The impact
Federal agencies gain more staff to defend against hacks. Job seekers find new career paths. Taxpayers fund expanded payroll.
More cybersecurity workers help federal agencies better protect sensitive government data and critical infrastructure from attacks. This strengthens national security and reduces risks of major data breaches.
The bill creates employment opportunities in cybersecurity for Americans. Workers gain stable government jobs with good benefits and career advancement.
Expanding federal hiring encourages more people to train in cybersecurity skills. This strengthens America's overall tech workforce capacity.
Better-staffed cybersecurity teams reduce risks to public services that rely on government systems, including healthcare and emergency response.
Hiring more federal workers increases government payroll costs. Taxpayers must fund these new positions through taxes or budget cuts elsewhere.
Federal hiring may pull skilled workers away from private tech companies, potentially slowing private-sector innovation and competitiveness.
The bill lacks details on training quality or whether hiring more people actually solves cybersecurity problems. Success depends on implementation.
Federal agencies sometimes struggle with retention and outdated systems. More workers don't guarantee faster or better cybersecurity responses.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.