Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to prevent foreign money from funding U.S. political campaigns and elections.
The problem
Foreign individuals and organizations may secretly fund U.S. election campaigns, potentially influencing American politics without transparency or accountability.
The proposal
Strengthens rules to block foreign sources from donating to U.S. elections and requires better disclosure of funding sources in political advertising.
The impact
Political campaigns, foreign entities, and voters affected through stricter donation rules, more transparency in campaign funding, and potential compliance costs.
Helps prevent foreign governments or entities from secretly influencing American elections. Makes it harder for outside countries to meddle in U.S. politics through campaign donations.
Requires disclosure of who funds political ads and campaigns. Voters can better understand where campaign money comes from and who might be influencing candidates.
Prevents wealthy foreign interests from gaining unfair advantages in elections. Helps ensure American elections are decided by American voices, not foreign money.
Hard to track foreign money that hides behind shell companies or indirect methods. Foreign actors may find new ways to secretly fund campaigns despite the ban.
Campaigns and organizations need new systems to verify donors aren't foreign. Smaller campaigns may struggle to afford compliance with stricter rules.
Some argue donation limits restrict free speech rights. Critics worry overly strict rules prevent legitimate international groups from participating in U.S. political speech.
Unclear what counts as a 'foreign entity' and how to handle multinational companies. Vague rules could lead to confusion or unfair enforcement against legitimate organizations.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.