Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to establish and support apprenticeship colleges as alternative education pathways.
The problem
Many students lack affordable alternatives to traditional four-year colleges. Apprenticeships offer job training but lack formal college-like structures and recognition.
The proposal
Creates apprenticeship colleges combining classroom learning with paid job training. Establishes standards, funding, and federal support for these hybrid education programs.
The impact
Students gain affordable career paths. Employers get trained workers. Schools adapt programs. Taxpayers fund new education initiative.
Apprenticeship colleges let students earn money while learning. Students graduate with less debt and job experience. This helps lower-income students access quality training.
Companies get workers trained to their specific needs. Apprentices are productive employees while learning. This reduces hiring and training costs for businesses.
Students have choices beyond traditional college. Some people learn better through hands-on work. This expands pathways to good-paying jobs.
The economy needs skilled workers in many fields. Apprenticeship colleges can fill job shortages. This strengthens the country's competitiveness.
Creating new colleges requires federal funding. Taxpayers would pay for this program. Costs could grow if programs expand significantly.
New programs need strong oversight to maintain standards. Poorly run apprenticeships could waste resources. Ensuring quality across many programs is challenging.
Some students might choose apprenticeships over universities. This could reduce enrollment at four-year colleges. Universities might lose funding or students.
Creating new education systems takes time and planning. Different regions have different needs and industries. Rolling out nationwide requires coordination and resources.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.