Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to prevent Chinese economic spying and theft of American business secrets.
The problem
The People's Republic of China allegedly conducts economic espionage against U.S. companies to steal trade secrets, technology, and business information, harming American competitiveness.
The proposal
Bill creates new criminal penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and procedures to combat economic espionage by Chinese government entities and their agents.
The impact
U.S. businesses, technology companies, government agencies, and law enforcement gain new tools; Chinese entities and individuals engaging in espionage face criminal consequences.
Clear criminal penalties discourage foreign agents from targeting American businesses. May reduce the billions of dollars lost annually to economic espionage.
Provides FBI and other agencies with stronger legal authority to investigate and prosecute economic espionage cases. Improves their ability to catch and stop spies.
Stronger laws make it riskier for foreign governments to steal American company secrets and technology. This helps U.S. companies keep their innovations safe and competitive.
Reduces foreign access to sensitive American technology in defense, energy, and other critical industries. Helps protect government and military information from espionage.
Aggressive enforcement could strain U.S.-China trade and diplomatic relationships. May lead to retaliatory actions that hurt American companies operating in China.
Broad definitions of espionage could lead to targeting legitimate researchers, students, or business contacts. May chill normal international business and scientific collaboration.
Without the bill's complete language, it's impossible to assess penalties, scope, and potential consequences. Vague rules could create confusion about what's actually illegal.
Companies may need new security systems and procedures to comply with stricter requirements. Small businesses could face expensive implementation and monitoring costs.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.