Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill expands the use of artificial intelligence voices in various applications and services.
The problem
Current regulations may limit how AI-generated voices can be used in business, entertainment, and technology. Companies want clearer rules.
The proposal
The bill likely removes restrictions on AI voice technology use, allowing broader applications across industries without certain regulatory barriers.
The impact
Tech companies, broadcasters, and service providers gain more freedom. Users may encounter more AI voices in apps, calls, and media.
Companies can develop new products and services using AI voices more easily. This could create jobs in tech and entertainment sectors. Businesses save money on voice talent.
AI voices help people with disabilities communicate and access information. Text-to-speech technology improves when companies can innovate freely.
Reduced barriers mean cheaper services for customers. AI voices cost less than hiring human voice actors, savings that could be passed to consumers.
Fewer restrictions help American tech companies compete internationally. Other countries have less strict AI voice rules.
AI voices could be used to impersonate real people in scams or fake news. Criminals might deceive others more easily with realistic-sounding voices.
Professional voice actors and narrators may lose work to cheaper AI alternatives. Workers in entertainment and media sectors could be displaced.
AI voices that sound like real people might be created without permission. Someone's voice could be copied and used without their approval.
Fake audio of politicians or public figures could spread false information. People may struggle to know if audio is real or AI-generated.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2024 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.