Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Establishes rules and oversight for artificial intelligence agents operating in the United States.
The problem
AI systems are becoming more autonomous and powerful. There are concerns about safety, accountability, and how they affect consumers and workers without clear federal guidelines.
The proposal
Creates legal framework for AI agents. Likely establishes oversight requirements, safety standards, and accountability measures for autonomous AI systems used in commerce and services.
The impact
Affects AI companies, tech workers, businesses using AI, and consumers interacting with AI systems. May require companies to follow new rules and report AI activities.
Clear rules help protect people from harmful or unfair AI systems. Consumers get better transparency about when they interact with AI and how their data is used.
Uniform federal standards level the playing field for companies. Smaller businesses won't be undercut by large tech firms avoiding safety rules.
Requirements help prevent dangerous AI malfunctions in critical areas like healthcare, transportation, and finance. Reduces risks to public safety.
Accountability measures may include protections for workers displaced by AI. Ensures companies consider worker impacts when deploying automation.
Companies must invest in new compliance systems, reporting, and legal review. Small startups may struggle more than large corporations to afford these expenses.
Strict regulations may delay or discourage development of beneficial AI technologies. Companies might avoid risky but promising projects due to regulatory burden.
Without bill details, companies face uncertainty about what exactly complies with law. Vague standards lead to confusion and potential uneven enforcement.
Broad regulatory power could limit beneficial uses of AI. Government oversight might be too restrictive or lag behind rapid AI development.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.