Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Prevents fraudsters from staging car accidents to collect insurance money.
The problem
Criminals intentionally cause car accidents to file false insurance claims, costing insurers and honest customers money through higher premiums.
The proposal
Bill establishes penalties and enforcement mechanisms to detect and prosecute people who deliberately stage accidents for insurance fraud.
The impact
Insurance companies, drivers, law enforcement, and accident victims affected through fraud prevention, claim investigation changes, and potential reduced premiums.
Reducing staged accident fraud could lower premiums for honest drivers. Insurance companies waste billions annually on fraudulent claims, passing costs to customers. Less fraud means lower rates for everyone.
People injured in real accidents won't be blamed for staged incidents. Legitimate claims process faster when fraud is reduced. Accident victims get fair treatment.
Gives police clearer tools to investigate suspicious accidents. Better coordination between insurers and authorities improves public safety. Criminals face real consequences for fraud.
Fewer fraudulent claims reduce government costs for programs affected by inflated insurance data. Resources go to real victims instead.
Enforcement may require tracking accident reports and insurance data closely. People worry about surveillance and data collection. Privacy advocates may oppose expanded monitoring.
Accident victims could be falsely accused of staging. Proving innocence may be difficult and costly. Legitimate claims might face extra scrutiny unfairly.
New enforcement systems and investigations require funding. Training officers and building databases costs money upfront. Results may take years to show savings.
Definitions of 'staged accident' might be vague and disputed in court. Different judges may interpret penalties differently. Litigation costs could be high.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.