Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to remove illegal immigrants from the United States.
The problem
The bill responds to concerns about immigration enforcement and the presence of undocumented immigrants in the country.
The proposal
Legislation establishing procedures for removal of illegal immigrants, though specific mechanisms are not detailed in available information.
The impact
Undocumented immigrants would face removal proceedings. Immigration enforcement agencies would have expanded authority. Communities with immigrant populations could experience changes.
Supporters argue clear removal procedures strengthen immigration law enforcement. This could deter future illegal entry and ensure consequences for violations. It reflects prioritization of legal immigration processes.
Proponents suggest removing undocumented workers may reduce competition for jobs in certain sectors. This could potentially increase wages or availability for citizens and legal residents seeking employment.
Supporters contend that enforcing immigration law upholds legal standards. Consistent enforcement of existing statutes demonstrates that immigration rules apply equally to all.
Critics warn that mass removal could disrupt industries relying on immigrant labor like agriculture, construction, and hospitality. This could reduce economic productivity and increase consumer costs for affected goods and services.
Opponents raise concerns about family separations and hardship for long-term residents. This includes impacts on children, mixed-status families, and communities depending on these workers.
Critics note that large-scale removal requires significant government spending on enforcement, legal proceedings, and deportation. Fiscal impact could be substantial and divert resources from other priorities.
Legal experts raise concerns about ensuring proper due process protections during removal proceedings. Rapid or inadequate procedures could violate constitutional safeguards.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10740
To designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
HR 10656
Nicholas Douglas Quets Border Travel Safety Act
S 5521
Ukrainian Adjustment Act of 2026
S 5490
A bill to designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.