Latest action: Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 318.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Lindsey Graham (R-SC)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
This bill aims to reduce federal funding for cities that limit immigration enforcement cooperation.
The problem
Some cities have policies restricting local police from helping federal immigration agents. Supporters say this hampers immigration enforcement and public safety efforts nationwide.
The proposal
The bill would reduce federal grants and funding to cities with sanctuary policies that prevent local law enforcement from assisting federal immigration authorities.
The impact
Cities with sanctuary policies would lose federal funding. Immigration enforcement could increase. Local police resources would shift toward federal immigration work.
Proponents argue the bill would create uniform immigration enforcement across the country. They contend that sanctuary policies create confusion and undermine federal law. Consistent enforcement could deter illegal immigration.
Supporters believe local governments should not obstruct federal immigration law. They argue the bill protects federal authority and ensures immigration laws are enforced uniformly.
Backers contend federal funding should not support jurisdictions that refuse to cooperate on federal priorities. Tying funding to compliance encourages alignment with national policies.
Supporters argue cooperation between local and federal authorities improves public safety outcomes. They believe removing barriers to cooperation helps identify and apprehend dangerous individuals.
Critics argue that immigrant communities already fear police and this bill worsens that. When people fear deportation, they won't report crimes or cooperate with police. This undermines overall public safety and community trust.
Opponents say this is an unfair use of federal funding as punishment. Cities set their own policies through local democracy. Withholding funds coerces compliance rather than persuading through debate.
Critics contend local police should focus on local crime, not federal immigration work. Diverting officers to immigration enforcement reduces capacity for community policing and local crime prevention.
Opponents raise questions about federal overreach and states' rights to set local policing priorities. They argue the federal government cannot commandeer state and local resources for federal purposes.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.