Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to protect Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations and personnel.
The problem
ICE agents report facing legal challenges, protests, and operational obstacles when enforcing immigration laws. Supporters say these issues hinder law enforcement effectiveness.
The proposal
The bill would strengthen legal protections for ICE officers and expand their authority during immigration enforcement operations and arrests.
The impact
ICE agents would gain broader legal protections. Immigrants facing deportation and advocacy groups would face fewer legal barriers to enforcement actions.
ICE officers could perform their duties with reduced legal liability. This may help recruitment and retention of immigration enforcement personnel.
Reducing legal obstacles to immigration enforcement could make deportation procedures faster. Supporters argue this improves government efficiency.
Provides additional protections for agents working in potentially dangerous situations. May improve workplace safety for ICE personnel.
Immigrants would have fewer opportunities to challenge arrests in court. Critics worry this limits due process rights and legal defenses.
Broader ICE authority could lead to more aggressive enforcement tactics. Critics worry about wrongful arrests and civil rights violations.
Expanded enforcement powers might increase fear in immigrant communities. This could make people reluctant to report crimes or cooperate with police.
Reducing court review of ICE actions weakens checks on government power. Critics say courts should review enforcement decisions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.