Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to eliminate sanctuary cities that limit immigration enforcement cooperation.
The problem
Some cities have policies restricting local police from helping federal immigration authorities. Supporters argue this creates public safety issues and undermines immigration law enforcement.
The proposal
The bill would penalize or eliminate sanctuary city policies by conditioning federal funding or imposing requirements on local law enforcement to cooperate with immigration authorities.
The impact
Affects local governments, police departments, immigrant communities, and federal immigration enforcement. Changes how cities can set their own immigration enforcement policies.
Creates consistent immigration law enforcement across all cities rather than varying local policies. Supporters argue this ensures federal laws are applied equally everywhere and prevents gaps in enforcement.
Proponents claim increased federal-local cooperation could help identify and remove individuals with criminal records. May improve coordination between different law enforcement agencies.
Establishes clearer federal versus local government roles in immigration enforcement. Removes ambiguity about whether cities can set their own immigration policies.
Immigrant communities may avoid reporting crimes if police share information with immigration authorities. This could reduce public safety as witnesses become reluctant to cooperate with local law enforcement.
Requires local police to perform immigration enforcement tasks without necessarily providing federal funding. Cities may face budget pressures implementing new federal requirements.
Limits cities' ability to set their own public safety and budget priorities independently. Removes local control over police department policies and resource allocation.
May raise legal issues about federal power over local governments and the Tenth Amendment. States and cities argue immigration enforcement is primarily a federal responsibility.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10740
To designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
HR 10656
Nicholas Douglas Quets Border Travel Safety Act
S 5521
Ukrainian Adjustment Act of 2026
S 5490
A bill to designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.