Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Senate bill to establish federal rules for creating and using artificial intelligence technology.
The problem
AI is growing rapidly but lacks clear national rules. Companies, researchers, and government agencies need consistent guidelines on how to develop and use AI safely.
The proposal
Creates federal standards and oversight for AI development. Establishes requirements for testing, transparency, and safety before companies release AI systems to the public.
The impact
Affects tech companies building AI, businesses using AI, researchers, and the public who interact with AI systems daily through apps and services.
Clear rules help ensure AI systems work correctly and don't harm people. Companies must test AI before release, similar to how medicines need FDA approval.
All companies follow the same rules instead of some cutting corners. This levels the playing field for startups competing against large tech giants.
Rules can include protections for workers whose jobs are affected by AI. Standards help ensure AI is used responsibly in workplaces.
Requirements can force companies to tell people when they're using AI. This helps consumers understand how their data is used and analyzed.
Strict regulations and testing requirements take time and money. Companies might develop AI more slowly, and the U.S. could fall behind other countries in AI technology.
Small startups may not afford compliance costs that large companies can handle easily. This might kill small AI companies or prevent new ones from starting.
AI technology changes very quickly. Government rules written today could become wrong within months, making them hard to follow or useless.
Without seeing the actual bill, it's hard to know if rules make sense or if they conflict with other laws. Poor design could create problems.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.