Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 489.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-MS)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Adds Natchez Indians Grand Village and Jefferson College to the National Park System.
The problem
Two historic sites lack formal protection and resources as part of the national park network, limiting preservation and public access.
The proposal
Designates the Grand Village of the Natchez Indians and Jefferson College as affiliated areas of the National Park System.
The impact
Natchez Indian descendants, historians, tourists, and local communities gain protected historic sites with enhanced funding and visitor services.
Protects and honors the Grand Village of the Natchez Indians, an important pre-Columbian archaeological site. Ensures the culture and heritage of the Natchez people are preserved for future generations. Provides resources for proper site maintenance and research.
National Park System designation attracts more visitors to the region. Local businesses benefit from increased tourism spending. Communities gain economic development opportunities.
Federal affiliation provides funding for visitor centers, interpretive programs, and educational materials. Better infrastructure allows schools and tourists to learn about Native American and early American history. Makes these historic sites more accessible to the public.
Official national park status elevates the importance of Natchez Indian heritage. Affirms the historical significance of the Natchez people. Provides a platform for sharing Native American perspectives and contributions to U.S. history.
Creating new affiliated areas requires federal funding for management, staff, and operations. Costs may include facility construction, maintenance, and visitor services. Budget impacts during tight fiscal periods.
National Park System affiliation may reduce local decision-making authority over the sites. Federal regulations could conflict with community preferences. Local governments may have less control over site development and operations.
Land acquisition or access agreements may be needed. Private property owners could face restrictions or land-use changes. Disputes over boundaries or access rights may arise.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.