Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 471.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Senate Majority Leader schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Transfer a Forest Service administrative office building to Gila County, Arizona.
The problem
The federal government owns and operates the Pleasant Valley Ranger District Administrative Site in Arizona. Local transfer could reduce federal management costs and streamline local operations.
The proposal
The Secretary of Agriculture must convey the Pleasant Valley Ranger District Administrative Site to Gila County, Arizona. This transfers federal property to local county control.
The impact
Gila County gains a federal building and administrative responsibilities. The Forest Service loses a facility. County taxpayers may gain or lose depending on transfer terms and ongoing costs.
Gila County can manage the facility according to local needs and priorities. Local governments often respond faster to community concerns than federal agencies.
Transferring the property removes it from the federal budget. This reduces taxpayer costs for federal facility maintenance and operations.
County ownership may enable alternative uses or partnerships. The property could support local economic projects or services.
Gila County must now maintain and operate the facility. This creates new expenses for a rural county with limited tax revenue.
If the county cannot operate it effectively, ranger district services may decline. Forest management and public services could suffer.
The bill does not specify whether the county receives funding, whether liabilities transfer, or what operational expectations exist. This ambiguity creates risk.
No official summary explains the reasoning, costs, or benefits. The public lacks details to assess whether this transfer serves community interests.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.