Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 486.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Senate Majority Leader schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Transfers control of certain federal land in California to different administrative jurisdiction.
The problem
Federal land management in California may need reorganization. Different agencies may have overlapping or inefficient control of certain properties.
The proposal
The bill transfers administrative control of specified federal land parcels in California from one federal agency or jurisdiction to another.
The impact
Land management practices, local communities, federal agencies, and stakeholders in California are affected by jurisdiction changes.
Consolidating land under one agency could reduce administrative confusion and overlap. This may lead to more efficient decision-making and faster land management actions.
Transfer may allow local California governments or communities closer say in land decisions. This could align management with regional needs and priorities.
Reducing administrative duplication between agencies could lower operational costs. Streamlined management might save taxpayer money on federal land administration.
Transferring federal land may weaken environmental protections if the new agency has fewer conservation resources. Sensitive ecosystems could face increased development pressure.
Communities, businesses, and conservation groups may face uncertainty during jurisdiction transition. New management rules could disrupt existing land use agreements and plans.
Federal oversight of public land ensures consistent national standards. Transfers could create patchwork management with varying quality across regions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.