Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill establishes new procurement procedures for federal information technology purchases.
The problem
Federal government needs clearer rules for how agencies buy technology and IT services to improve efficiency and reduce waste.
The proposal
Creates standardized procurement requirements and processes for federal IT purchases across all government agencies.
The impact
Federal agencies, IT vendors, and taxpayers are affected through changed purchasing rules and potentially different IT costs.
Standardized procedures make it easier for agencies to understand what they must do when purchasing IT. This reduces confusion and makes the process more efficient across government.
Clear procurement rules may help government agencies avoid overpaying for IT services. Standardized processes can reduce waste and administrative costs.
Standardized rules ensure all IT companies compete on equal terms. This transparency helps smaller businesses bid fairly for government contracts.
Clear procedures make it easier to track how government spends money on IT. This improves oversight and government transparency.
New standardized procedures could make buying IT services take longer. Agencies might face delays when they need to respond quickly to technology problems.
Agencies must spend money and time learning and following new rules. This creates administrative burdens for already stretched government budgets.
Standardized rules might prevent agencies from choosing the best solution for their specific needs. One-size-fits-all rules don't work well for different types of agencies.
Without seeing the actual rules, it's unclear if they will work well in practice. Poor implementation could create confusion instead of solving problems.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.