Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 495.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Allows livestock grazing on public lands to reduce wildfire risk through vegetation management.
The problem
Wildfires threaten communities and public lands. Dense vegetation increases fire severity. Current grazing restrictions limit a potential management tool.
The proposal
Expands strategic grazing permits on federal lands to reduce flammable vegetation and lower wildfire risk through controlled livestock use.
The impact
Ranchers, environmental groups, communities near wildfires, and public land users are affected by changed grazing policies and land management practices.
Livestock can eat vegetation that fuels fires. This natural approach may lower severity and spread of wildfires threatening homes and communities.
More grazing permits provide income opportunities for ranchers. This helps rural communities that depend on livestock operations.
Using grazing instead of expensive controlled burns or mechanical removal may save taxpayer money on land management.
Grazing is a traditional, low-tech approach that works with nature rather than requiring heavy machinery or chemicals.
Grazing can damage sensitive plants, pollute water, and harm wildlife habitat. Overgrazing may cause soil erosion and ecosystem damage.
Research is mixed on whether grazing effectively reduces wildfire risk compared to other methods. Results depend heavily on timing and location.
More grazing may conflict with hiking, camping, hunting, and wildlife viewing on public lands that many Americans use recreationally.
Ensuring grazing is done properly and doesn't cause harm requires ongoing government oversight and spending to monitor permits.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.