Latest action: Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Doris Matsui (D-CA)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
HR 952 allows the federal government to transfer certain lands with reversionary interests to private or state ownership.
The problem
Some federal lands have conditions requiring them to return to the government if certain uses end. These reversionary interests complicate land ownership and management, creating legal and administrative challenges.
The proposal
The bill permits federal agencies to convey lands with reversionary interests to states, local governments, or private parties, potentially removing the federal reversion requirement.
The impact
Landowners, state governments, and local communities gain clearer property rights. Federal government loses some control over previously managed public lands and their future uses.
Removing reversionary conditions simplifies land titles and ownership records. This makes it easier for new owners to develop, use, or manage the land without legal uncertainty about federal reclamation.
States and local governments can manage transferred lands according to community needs and priorities. This shifts decision-making power from federal agencies to elected officials closer to the affected areas.
Federal agencies spend resources tracking and enforcing reversionary interests on complex lands. Transferring these lands reduces federal administrative costs and bureaucratic oversight requirements.
Private owners and local governments may invest in and develop transferred lands for economic benefit. Clear ownership can encourage private investment and local economic growth.
Reversionary interests often protect public lands from certain uses. Removing these protections could allow private development that harms the environment or eliminates public access to natural areas.
The federal government loses its ability to reclaim lands if original purposes are abandoned. This weakens federal oversight of land use and environmental standards across states.
Private or state owners may not maintain the same environmental protections as the federal government. Lands could be converted to uses that damage ecosystems, water quality, or wildlife habitat.
Different states and private owners will manage lands differently. This could create patchwork protection with varying environmental and conservation standards across regions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.