Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Allows the President to issue cyber letters of marque and reprisal against foreign targets.
The problem
The United States may lack clear legal authority to conduct certain cyber operations against adversaries during conflicts or security crises.
The proposal
Grants the President power to issue letters of marque and reprisal for cyber operations, similar to historical privateering authorizations.
The impact
Affects international relations, cybersecurity operations, private companies, and foreign governments through expanded presidential cyber authority.
Could allow quicker authorization of cyber operations against attackers without lengthy legal reviews. Provides a legal framework for responding to major cyber incidents.
Establishes explicit congressional approval for certain cyber operations. Reduces legal uncertainty about what the President can do in cyberspace.
Adds another tool for national defense without requiring military action. Could deter cyber attacks by showing willingness to respond.
May violate international agreements and norms against privateering. Could damage U.S. relationships with allied nations.
Could spiral into unintended conflict if cyber operations escalate. Private actors might lack proper training or oversight.
Cyber attacks are hard to trace to their real source. Could authorize strikes against wrong targets or innocent parties.
Expanded cyber authority could enable broader government surveillance or hacking powers. May threaten Americans' digital privacy rights.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.