Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires states to allow voters to cast ballots by Election Day through mail or early voting.
The problem
Some voters struggle to vote on Election Day due to work, travel, or other obligations. States have different voting access rules, which can limit participation.
The proposal
The bill would require states to offer multiple ways to vote before Election Day, including mail-in ballots and early in-person voting options available to all eligible voters.
The impact
Voters gain more voting options and flexibility. Election officials must manage expanded voting methods. States may need new procedures and funding for implementation.
More people could vote without taking time off work or arranging childcare. Voters with disabilities or mobility issues get more options. This could increase voter participation.
Spreading voting across multiple days and methods reduces long lines at polling places. This makes voting faster and less stressful for all voters.
Federal requirement ensures all states offer similar voting methods. This creates fairness across the country and clarifies rules for voters.
Election workers face less stress with staggered voting. Technical problems are easier to manage when voting happens over time rather than one day.
States traditionally manage elections. Federal mandate reduces state flexibility to set voting rules. States may need to challenge this as overreach.
States must purchase equipment, train staff, and update systems for expanded voting. Smaller states with fewer resources may struggle. Costs could be significant.
More voting methods and longer voting periods create more complex security challenges. Tracking ballots over time requires stronger safeguards. Some worry about fraud risks.
States must manage multiple voting methods simultaneously. Poll worker training becomes more complex. Coordination between mail voting and in-person voting takes effort.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.