Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
A bill to allow workers to take unpaid leave without losing their jobs or benefits.
The problem
Workers may face job loss or benefit cuts when they need to take time off for personal, family, or health reasons.
The proposal
Establishes protections allowing eligible employees to take unpaid leave while keeping their job and health insurance coverage.
The impact
Employees gain job security during leave; employers face compliance requirements and potential operational challenges managing workforce gaps.
Employees can take needed time off without fear of losing their position. This helps people handle emergencies, family matters, or health issues without workplace consequences.
Workers keep their health coverage while on leave. This ensures people can maintain medical protection during vulnerable times.
Job security during leave reduces anxiety and allows employees to focus on personal needs. This may improve overall worker wellbeing and mental health.
Workers can care for sick family members or handle family emergencies without losing income stability. This supports family relationships and caregiving responsibilities.
Employers must find temporary replacements or redistribute work when employees take leave. Small businesses may struggle with staffing gaps and training costs.
Employers might avoid hiring workers likely to use leave protections, such as parents or people with health conditions. This could indirectly harm job prospects.
Workers still lose income during leave even with job protection. Lower-income workers may struggle financially, limiting the benefit for those who need it most.
Small employers with limited staff face greater disruption than large corporations. Compliance costs may burden small business owners disproportionately.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1607
Expressing support for the designation of September 2026 as "National Workforce Development Month".
HR 10703
Protecting Workers’ Benefits Act
S 5615
VEST Act
S 5646
Direct Seller and Real Estate Agent Harmonization Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.