Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates a national coordination system to strengthen security and disaster readiness across government agencies.
The problem
Government agencies working on security and emergency response lack coordinated planning and communication systems, creating gaps in national preparedness.
The proposal
Establishes a coordination mechanism for federal agencies to align resilience and security strategies, improve information sharing, and develop unified response plans.
The impact
Federal agencies, state/local governments, and the public benefit from better emergency coordination and potentially faster disaster response.
Coordinated federal agencies can respond faster and more effectively to disasters and security threats. This reduces confusion during crises and saves lives.
When agencies share information better, they can identify threats earlier and prevent problems. This strengthens national security.
Better federal coordination means clearer guidance for cities and states preparing for emergencies. Communities can plan more effectively.
Coordination eliminates agencies doing the same work separately, saving government money and resources.
Creating new coordination systems requires funding. The bill doesn't specify budget details, so costs are unclear.
The bill lacks specific details about how coordination will work, who leads it, or what it actually requires agencies to do.
Increased information sharing between agencies could raise questions about privacy if not properly controlled.
New coordination systems can sometimes slow decisions instead of speeding them up, especially if there are too many layers.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.