Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires Medicare Advantage plans to clearly disclose what extra benefits they offer.
The problem
Medicare Advantage beneficiaries struggle to understand which supplemental benefits their plans include, making it hard to compare plans and choose the right coverage.
The proposal
Mandates Medicare Advantage insurers provide transparent, standardized disclosures about supplemental benefits offered under their plans.
The impact
Medicare Advantage enrollees gain clearer information for decision-making. Insurers must update disclosure practices. Regulators monitor compliance with transparency rules.
Seniors can more easily compare plans and understand what extra benefits are included. This helps people pick plans that actually match their health needs and preferences.
Clear disclosure prevents beneficiaries from discovering after enrollment that expected benefits are not covered. Reduces confusion and complaints about plan coverage.
When people understand benefits clearly, plans must compete more on what they offer. This can encourage insurers to improve benefits or lower costs to attract customers.
Standardized, transparent information helps seniors make healthcare decisions based on facts rather than confusing marketing materials.
Insurance companies must spend money redesigning materials and systems to meet new transparency standards. These costs could be passed to customers through higher premiums.
Creating standardized disclosures for diverse plans is difficult. Rules could become overly complicated or require frequent updates as plans change.
Strict disclosure rules might discourage insurers from offering creative or customized benefits if the regulatory burden becomes too heavy.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.