Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 316.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Ashley Moody (R-FL)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Creates federal criminal penalties for unauthorized drone surveillance activities.
The problem
Drones equipped with surveillance technology may be used to spy on people without permission, raising concerns about privacy violations and national security threats.
The proposal
Establishes new federal crimes for operating drones to conduct espionage or unauthorized surveillance against individuals, facilities, or government operations.
The impact
Affects drone operators, law enforcement, privacy advocates, and citizens concerned about airspace security and surveillance activities.
Creates legal consequences for people using drones to spy on others without permission. This protects citizens from unwanted surveillance and helps enforce privacy expectations in their homes and properties.
Provides tools to prosecute unauthorized surveillance near sensitive government facilities, military bases, or critical infrastructure. Helps prevent foreign or domestic actors from gathering intelligence using drone technology.
Defines what drone surveillance is illegal, giving law enforcement clear rules to enforce. Creates certainty for both drone operators and the public about what activities are prohibited.
Responds to new capabilities that existing laws don't adequately cover. Keeps criminal law updated with modern technology developments.
Without detailed definitions, the law might be interpreted too widely and could criminalize legitimate drone activities like journalism, research, or hobby flying. Unclear language could lead to unfair prosecutions.
The bill provides no information about how these laws will be enforced or what resources law enforcement needs. Unclear enforcement could lead to inconsistent application across different regions.
Overly strict penalties might discourage lawful commercial drone businesses and hobbyists. Technology companies and small businesses using drones could face increased legal risk and compliance costs.
No official summary means the specific definition of 'espionage' and what counts as illegal surveillance is unknown. Different interpretations could create legal confusion.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.