Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, Financial Services, Education and Workforce, and Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Restricts federal benefits to U.S. citizens and lawful residents only.
The problem
Concerns about non-citizens accessing federal welfare, healthcare, and financial assistance programs intended for citizens and documented legal residents.
The proposal
Modifies eligibility requirements across Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and other federal benefits to verify citizenship or lawful domicile status before distribution.
The impact
Citizens and lawful residents may face verification delays. Non-citizens would lose access to most federal benefits. States managing Medicaid programs must implement new verification systems.
Ensures federal assistance reaches citizens and legal residents as originally intended. May reduce costs by limiting benefits to the documented eligible population.
Responds to public concerns about benefit eligibility verification. Creates uniform national standards across different federal programs.
Establishes clear rules about who qualifies for assistance. Reduces ambiguity in benefit administration across agencies.
Requires new systems to verify citizenship and domicile status across multiple agencies and states. Could be expensive and create administrative burden on states managing programs.
New verification requirements may slow benefit processing for citizens and legal residents who need assistance quickly. Could deny timely care to vulnerable populations.
May face legal challenges regarding federal power, state authority, and due process rights. Unclear how verification aligns with existing immigration law.
Restricting healthcare access based on status could create public health risks and humanitarian issues for vulnerable populations including children and emergency cases.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.