Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to expand student access to advanced academic courses in schools.
The problem
Some students lack equal access to advanced coursework like AP and honors classes due to school funding, location, or enrollment barriers.
The proposal
Requires schools to improve access to advanced courses through funding, teacher training, and removing barriers that prevent qualified students from enrolling.
The impact
Students gain more course options. Schools need resources to expand programs. Teachers may need additional training in advanced subjects.
More students can access rigorous coursework that improves college readiness. This helps lower-income and rural students compete fairly. Advanced courses boost academic achievement.
Advanced coursework access is often unequal by race and income. This bill targets that inequity. Closing gaps improves educational fairness.
Students completing advanced courses perform better in college. This increases college completion rates. Better preparation leads to stronger careers.
Advanced education opens higher-paying job opportunities. This helps students escape poverty. Strong education builds stronger communities.
Expanding advanced programs requires hiring trained teachers and buying materials. Schools may struggle with costs. Funding sources are unclear.
Many schools already lack teachers qualified to teach advanced courses. Increased demand may worsen shortages. Training takes time and money.
Rapid expansion without proper support could lower course quality. Students may not receive adequate instruction. Standards might drop.
Schools vary widely in resources and capacity. Rural and poor districts may struggle most. Uneven implementation could increase inequity.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.