Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Expands paid leave benefits for American workers across more employers and situations.
The problem
Many American workers lack paid leave for illness, family care, or personal needs. This creates hardship for workers and their families.
The proposal
The bill likely requires or incentivizes employers to provide more paid leave time to employees. Specifics are unavailable as the bill has no official summary.
The impact
Workers would gain more paid time off. Employers would face new requirements or costs. Families could better handle emergencies and health needs.
Workers could take time to rest when sick or care for family members. This reduces stress and prevents burnout. Healthier workers are more productive.
Parents could take time for childcare without losing income. People caring for elderly relatives get needed flexibility. Families face fewer financial crises.
Low-wage workers currently have least access to paid leave. This law would help workers who need it most. More fair treatment across income levels.
Workers who can stay home when sick spread fewer illnesses. Communities experience fewer disease outbreaks. Healthcare system faces less pressure.
Small employers may struggle to afford paid leave programs. They might hire fewer workers or reduce wages. Some small businesses could close.
Employers facing high costs might eliminate positions. Some workers could be replaced by automation. Overall employment could decline slightly.
Employers may pass costs to customers through higher prices. Inflation could increase, especially for small businesses. Working families might pay more for goods.
With more workers taking leave, scheduling becomes difficult. Remaining workers may face longer hours. Customer service could decline.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1607
Expressing support for the designation of September 2026 as "National Workforce Development Month".
HR 10703
Protecting Workers’ Benefits Act
S 5615
VEST Act
S 5646
Direct Seller and Real Estate Agent Harmonization Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.