Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
A bill to improve reading programs and literacy support for young students in American schools.
The problem
Many young students struggle with reading skills. Schools need better resources and programs to help children learn to read effectively.
The proposal
The bill likely funds reading programs, teacher training, and literacy initiatives. It aims to strengthen reading instruction in schools nationwide.
The impact
Students, teachers, and schools benefit from improved reading programs. Families may see better literacy outcomes. Schools need resources to implement changes.
Funding for reading programs helps students who fall behind in literacy. Better instruction means more children develop strong reading skills early. This supports long-term academic success.
Training and resources help teachers teach reading more effectively. Teachers gain better tools and methods to reach all students. This improves classroom instruction quality.
Strong reading skills help students succeed in all subjects and careers. Early literacy support reduces future academic and economic struggles. Communities benefit from more educated citizens.
The bill requires federal funding, which increases government spending. Taxpayers must pay for these programs. Budget constraints may limit other priorities.
Schools vary widely in resources and needs. A one-size-fits-all approach may not work everywhere. Success depends on proper local implementation.
Without an official summary, specific provisions are unknown. It is hard to evaluate exact impacts and costs. Congress should clarify what the bill actually does.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.