Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Renames DC's tuition assistance program after Eleanor Holmes Norton.
The problem
The District of Columbia tuition assistance grant program currently lacks a name honoring notable figures who advanced education access.
The proposal
The bill officially names the tuition assistance grant program the Eleanor Holmes Norton District of Columbia Tuition Assistance Grant Program.
The impact
DC students receiving tuition assistance will see the program named after Eleanor Holmes Norton, a prominent civil rights advocate.
Eleanor Holmes Norton was a significant civil rights attorney and advocate. Naming the program after her recognizes her contributions to equality and opportunity. This provides historical acknowledgment of her work.
A named program may draw more attention and pride from students and families. This could improve awareness of available tuition assistance benefits. Higher visibility might encourage more eligible students to apply.
Renaming a program requires few resources or budget changes. The actual tuition assistance funding and operations remain unchanged. This is a low-cost way to recognize important figures.
Naming programs after pioneers celebrates their accomplishments and impact. This can inspire future generations to pursue education and public service. It strengthens DC's connection to civil rights history.
Renaming alone does not increase funding or expand assistance. Students' actual tuition support levels remain exactly the same. The bill addresses symbolism rather than substantive improvements.
Congress time could focus on bills that expand services or increase funding. Naming programs, while meaningful, uses legislative resources on ceremonial matters. Pressing education needs might require more urgent attention.
Agencies must update official documents, websites, and communications. All printed materials and references need revision. This creates minor administrative burden and cost.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.