Latest action: Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S5299)
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The House voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the Senate, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Bill allowing people with disabilities more choices for how they receive long-term care services.
The problem
People with disabilities often have limited options for receiving care and support services. Current systems may not give them enough choice in how and where they get help.
The proposal
The bill expands options for individuals with disabilities to choose different ways to receive care, including community-based services instead of only institutional settings.
The impact
People with disabilities gain more control over their care choices. Families, care providers, and state programs managing disability services are also affected.
People with disabilities get to decide how they receive care instead of being limited to one option. This respects their independence and preferences.
People can stay in their communities with family and friends rather than in institutions. This can improve quality of life and social connections.
Community-based care is often less expensive than institutional care. States might save money while improving outcomes for individuals.
Research shows people with disabilities often do better health-wise when they have choice and control over their care decisions.
Expanding services and options requires funding, training, and new infrastructure. States may struggle with startup costs and staffing.
Rural areas may have fewer care options available than cities. This could create unfair disparities in who gets real choices.
More providers and options mean harder oversight. Protecting vulnerable people from bad care becomes more challenging.
More choice means more decisions families must make. Some families may lack resources to navigate new options effectively.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.