Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to improve bird health and conservation through research and habitat protection programs.
The problem
Bird populations face threats from habitat loss, disease, and environmental changes. Current federal programs lack coordination and adequate funding for bird health research.
The proposal
Establishes the BIRD (Biodiversity Initiative for Research and Development) Health Act to fund research, monitoring, and habitat protection specifically for bird species health and survival.
The impact
Affects bird conservation efforts, environmental scientists, wildlife agencies, and communities dependent on bird habitats. May influence agricultural and development practices.
Funding research on bird health helps scientists understand diseases and threats. Better information leads to smarter conservation decisions and saves endangered species.
Birds play important roles in nature like pollination and pest control. Protecting birds helps keep entire ecosystems healthy and balanced.
New research programs and habitat projects create jobs for scientists, field workers, and conservation staff. Local economies benefit from environmental restoration work.
Healthy bird populations attract birdwatchers and nature tourists. This increases spending and revenue in rural and protected areas.
The bill requires federal funding that increases government spending and may raise taxes or reduce money for other programs. Budget impact depends on funding amounts not specified here.
Protecting bird habitats might limit where people can build or farm. Landowners could face restrictions on property use.
New rules and monitoring requirements could add costs and paperwork for agriculture, development, and industry. Compliance expenses may be significant.
Without detailed legislative text, it is unclear how programs will actually work. Poor implementation could waste resources or create conflicting rules.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.