Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Establishes a federal program to accelerate large-scale science and technology projects.
The problem
The U.S. faces competition from other nations in major scientific breakthroughs. Large research projects need better funding and coordination to succeed quickly.
The proposal
Creates the LEAP program to fund and support big science initiatives. Provides government resources to speed up research in technology and discovery.
The impact
Universities, researchers, tech companies, and taxpayers are affected. Scientists get more funding; costs to government increase; innovation may accelerate.
More funding helps researchers tackle big challenges faster. Could lead to breakthroughs in medicine, energy, and technology. Strengthens U.S. global competitiveness.
Scientists, engineers, and support staff would be hired for new projects. Universities and tech companies benefit from increased work and grants.
Advanced research in critical areas helps protect the country. Reduces dependence on other nations for key technologies.
Breakthrough innovations often create new industries and jobs. Could generate long-term economic benefits beyond initial investment.
Large new program costs taxpayer money. Government budget is already tight; may increase deficit unless other spending cuts occur.
Not all research projects produce useful results or profitable innovations. Money invested may not deliver promised breakthroughs or benefits.
Big universities and well-connected companies may get most funding. Small researchers and institutions could be left behind.
Government control of science funding can influence which projects get support. Research decisions might be made for political reasons, not scientific merit.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.